Okay, I've read the backs of Topps Cards for years. What the heck are these stats??! |
Topps did not include a list of the SP variations when the checklist for 2014 Topps Series 2 went live. Some people would complain to the high heavens that there isn't more transparency. But seriously, that kills the fun of discovering new and, quite frankly, weird themes for their short-printed cards.
Gone are the legends from the early part of the 20th century (I think the CMG license is long gone, but they still have some legends in their stable for later use). Now we get player celebrations, playoff celebrations, players off the field, and even some Boston Strong variations.
But the ones that Topps came out with for this series are probably the most unique they've come out with in a long time.
Because instead of using a second picture for the front of the cards, you now have to look on the back to see if you have a short print.
When the sell sheets for S2 went live, one of the insert sets they were going to include was something called "Saber Stars." Saber, meaning Sabermetrics, the statistics that the Society of Baseball Research (SABR...SABeR...get it?) use to compare players from the past to those in the present day. They say that these stats are more valuable in determining a player's worth on the field than the stats we've all been accustomed to. They say that batting average, home runs, rbi's...not good enough. Win-Loss records and ERA? Are they even necessary??? Now it's all about WAR (Wins above Replacement), OPS+ (which is on base percentage plus slugging percentage...kicked up a notch), FIP (right now, I have absolutely no idea what this means...we'll learn all of that shortly though), and other bizarre acronyms.
Now, I've always believed that every player leads the league in some category. It can be the most obscure category (like home run leader for those who has six letters in their last name or something). But the stats that Topps has included on the backs of these cards would scare collectors from the 1950's.
Now we all know the statistics that make up the regular batter's line for 2014 Topps added the WAR stat to the line up (removing strikeouts...a key stat for batters ). The rest of the stats we know:
- G - Games
- AB - At Bats
- R - Runs
- H - Hits
- 2B - Doubles
- 3B - Triples
- HR - Home Runs
- RBI - Runs Batted In
- SB - Stolen Bases
- BB - Bases on Ball/Walks
- SLG - Slugging Percentage (which takes the number of bases per hit divided by the number of at bats)
- OPS - On Base Percentage + Slugging Percentage (which first appeared in 2004 to appease rotisserie players)
- AVG-Batting Average (Total Hits/At-Bats)
- WAR-Wins above Replacement (formulas are complicated to explain)
- PA - Plate Appearances, every time a player makes an appearance at the plate (AB + BB + HBP + SF + SH)
- OPS+ - On Base Percentage Plus (100*[OBP/lg OBP + SLG/lg SLG - 1]) Adjusted to the player’s ballpark(s). Confused yet?
- BB% - Percentage of the time player draws a walk (walks/plate appearance)
- K% - Percentage of the time a player strikes out (strikeout/plate appearance)
- BABIP - Batting Average when Ball is In Play, which is (hits - home runs/at bats - strikeouts + sacrifice flies)
- ISO - Isolated Power, which measures the average number of extra bases per at bat
- wOBA - Weighted On Base Average, a stat that is designed to measure a player's overall offensive contributions per plate appearance((0.72*Non intentional walks) + (0.75*Hit by Pitch) + (.90*singles) + (.92*reached base on error) + (1.24*doubles) + (1.56*triples) + (1.95*home runs))/plate appearances
- WRC+ - Weighted Runs Created, a players worth of runs for his team
- WPA - Win Probability Added, which is defined as the difference in win expectancy (WE) between the start of the play and the end of the play
- TB - Total Bases
- SB% - Stolen base percentage (stolen bases/stolen base attempts)
- TZR - Total Zone Runs, a defensive stat that measures the number of runs above or below average the player was worth based on the number of plays made
- WAR - Wins Above Replacement, which they already included on the base cards. Topps should have included the missing strikeout totals from the regular line and added them here instead of putting the WAR stat.
Don't think the pitchers were left out from all of the Saber-madness. They have their own set of stats too. Now as we all know, the regular pitcher's stat line this year excluded complete games (which is just as well as the number of these have decreased as bullpen dependency has increased). But the rest of the stats collectors recognize:
- G - Games
- W - Wins
- L - Losses
- IP - Innings Pitched
- H - Hits
- R - Runs
- ER - Earned Runs
- BB - Bases on Balls/Walks
- SO - Strikeouts
- SHO - Shutouts
- SV - Saves
- WHIP - Walks + Hits / Innings pitched (the added pitcher's stat for Roto players)
- ERA - Earned Run Average (Earned Runs / Innings pitched * 9)
- WAR - Wins Above Replacement (pitchers get this too)
For the pitchers, the following stats were included on the header:
- IP - Innings pitched
- QS% - Quality Start Percentage, which is the ratio of quality starts to total starts
- RS/GS - Run Support per Games Started (which now relies on the pitcher's offense)
- HR/9 - Number of Home Runs allowed per nine innings (think of an ERA for homers)
- SO/BB - Strikeouts to Walks ratio (or how many strikeouts per number of walks)
- LOB% - Percentage of runners left on base
- GB% - Ground ball percentage, or the number of balls that are put in play on the ground, whether it's a hit or an out
- WHIP - Walks + Hits / Innings Pitched (should have put complete games here instead)
- ERA+ - Adjusted ERA (100*[lgERA/ERA]) according to the player’s ballpark(s).
- FIP - Fielding Independent Pitching, which measures a pitcher's effectiveness at preventing HR, BB, HBP and causing SO ((13*HR + 3*(BB+HBP) - 2*SO)/IP + Constant). The constant is set so that each season MLB average FIP is the same as the MLB avg ERA
- WPA - Win Probability Added, which is defined as the difference in win expectancy (WE) between the start of the play and the end of the play
- WAR - Wins Above Replacement
Oh well, along with the saber SP's, there are the sparkles SP's, there are also more Future Star SP's (you thought Yasiel would be the only player in series 1 to get the SP FS treatment?) The players chosen for this subset are pictured during their respective "Futures Game" during the All-Star Festivities. So there are going to be a lot of US and World players, except for Tanaka...of course.
One final SP I would say would make a certain blogger go insane, but I think he's too far gone now to care.
Snoopy??! |
I'm going to bed. The stats are still flying in my head. Oh yeah, one quick way to tell if you have a saber stat SP? Check the code on the back of the card. Sabermetric variants end in 75. Series 2 base cards and other variations all end in 34.
Good luck.
Sincerely,
JayBee Anama
5 comments:
Thanks! I've been wondering how to go about finding out which ones of these are SP's.
My problem with SABR guys is that they are so arrogant to think that no one understood the game of baseball before 2002 or so. Yes some of the sabermetrics are very useful, but RBIs, wins, and batting average are still useful stats as well. I learned math at 9-10 by constantly checking and rechecking BA and ERA on the backs of baseball cards. There is no way a ten year old can make sense of these numbers. Maybe I am just getting old.
I'm all for stats that accurately measure a player's performance, but those people who are into those stats need to realize that formulas that complex are likely not going to be embraced by the common baseball fan. They need to step outside themselves a little bit and realize ... hey, there were kids in school who really didn't enjoy math.
As for the SSSPs ... *yawn*
I like the sabermetric stats but the guys who are devoted to it take it as gospel and want to make them mainstream as be all, end all as far as baseball stats.
It was easier to deem a guy having a good or bad year 10-15 years ago - but the numbers are more scrutinized.
As a fan, I use the sabermetric stats to figure out whether or not a player has any redeeming qualities in a given year where he hasn't had a good season.
I guess I'm a lone voice in the wilderness. Again.
I like the sabermetric stats.
I'd say more, but I run the risk of (a) really p*ssing off people more than I do already and(b) turning my comment into a blog post.
Post a Comment