Target Acquired...2009 Topps Series I Packs in Hand!!!

Didn't make it to Target on Sunday. So as soon as the kids were dropped off at school, I went straight to Target before going to work. Yes, the Target had a FULL BOX of 2009 Topps Series I (a box of 24 packs, 12 cards per pack). I don't know if this they just put this out, or if this was the only box left from the weekend. I was honestly tempted to get all 24 packs, but thought better of it. I bought 12 packs (total cost $26.33 with tax), leaving half the box for others who may be looking.

Pack breaks to come later. I'm not sure I like the pack design to be honest. But what does that matter, based on what bloggers have posted over the weekend, the cards look fantastic!!!

At least I have something to look forward to during the lunch hour. I can't wait.

Sincerely,

JayBee Anama

The Answer for This Week's Trivia Question, January 25, 2009

That was surprisingly quick, but to RoofGod, congratulations!!! You answered both of my questions correctly.

Yes, Ralph Branca, Joe Garagiola, Ralph Kiner Satchel Paige, only made one appearance on Topps baseball cards, so their first and last cards are from the same year (1952 for both Branca and Garagiola, and 1953 for Kiner and Paige).

And no 1999 card was reprinted for Topps Archives. Didn't anybody end their career in 1998-1999??? Also, 1951 was never used, but then again, maybe that was done on purpose as 1952-2001 = 50 years worth of cards (they didn't even do a 1951 Topps card for the Through the Years set...funny, no 2000 card either...).

Sincerely,

JayBee Anama

Random Notes and Responses to Comments on Superbowl Sunday!!!

It seems that the cat is out of the bag and 2009 Topps I is at Target stores somewhere (those that decided to put them out earlier than the actual release date that is). I'm on the hunt tomorrow, if not on Monday. Otherwise, I have to put a call in to my dealer (geez, that sounds bad).

I also purchased my third eBay item this weekend. When it arrives, I can scratch out the ten card 2008 Topps Holiday Set Bonus cards from the wantlist. Cost with shipping? $18.50. Still looking for that Berkman card though, and friend of the blog the drizz gave me a good tip to find one.

Speaking of my good friend the drizz...dude, I wrote that post earlier this week!!! If I do find something unique when I get to Target, I will post something worthwhile here.

To Patricia and Lucy at Dinged Corners...I have not forgotten your card. I finally was able to package the card and will ship it on Monday. I am now fully involved in the blogging community as I have no idea if I sent stuff to people or if it's still here.

Which reminds me...Greg (night owl), did I send that 2003 Topps Traded Rickey Henderson Dodgers card to you? I can't seem to find it in the chaos of my table, but I swear I had to have sent it. Please let me know. Thanks.

That's it for now. Getting ready to watch the Pirates and Diamondbacks this evening...oh wait, that's baseball. I mean, the Penguins and Coyotes...sorry, that's hockey. Panthers versus Wildcats...college. Just kidding.

It's the Steelers and the Cardinals for the big one today. Who am I for? I've always rooted for the NFC team in these games, but realistically, I'm not emotionally attached to either team. So go Cardinals (I can't believe I just said that...)

Sincerely,

JayBee Anama

Is It My Imagination...

...or is 2009 Topps already live??? Thanks to friend of the blog tdlindgren for showing this eBay Auction...

I have also seen auctions for Sketch Cards that are supposed to be inserted with 2009 Topps as well. More to come as details are made available!!!

Sincerely,

JayBee Anama

Cards That Crossed the Atlantic...Somebody Grab Me a Tissue!!!

So I finally got around to sending John Arnold of the Pursuit of 80'sness, Pursuit of Red Sox, and Pursuit of Jacoby Ellsbury, a full envelope of cards long after he sent me two full packages of Chicago Cubs cards.

He received the package last Saturday, and promptly thanked me for it on this post. Along with the Red Sox cards, I included three unopened packs each of 2008 Topps I, II, and Updates and Highlights. He was going to break open the packs on his Red Sox site.

Well, he just opened up the three series one packs. He received two Red Sox cards, one was Jason Varitek...

This was the other one:


Now if you'll excuse me, I'm going to go cry now...

Sincerely,

JayBee Anama

What a Day in the World of Sports Cards Huh???

I don't think I've ever seen the Hobby world more abuzz by all the news that showed up today.

First Donruss gets sued by MLB Properties (all stories, by the way, are courtesy of Chris Olds of Beckett). My question is...what took MLB so long??? Donruss had to know they were walking a fine line creating baseball cards, even though they were not licensed by MLB Properties. I mean it's great that they were mixing younger players with retired stars. And because the company was not restricted by the rules that UD and Topps are currently abiding by, they could even create cards of guys that have been banned from the sport like Joe Jackson and Pete Rose. Now while this is not necessarily a bad thing, the lawsuit stems from the fact that Donruss did not take out the logos trademarked and licensed by MLB Properties. As the MLB Properties states in their lawsuit:

"MLBP has been damaged and has suffered, and continues to suffer, immediate and irreparable injury for which it has no adequate remedy at law. The cards are likely to cause confusion, mistake or deception as to the source or origin of such trading cards and are likely to cause consumers to draw the false impression that Donruss and/or its trading cards are associated with, authorized, endorsed or sponsored by, or that Donruss is a sponsor of MLBP, MLB, MiLB, and other corporate properties."

Sure they did do some airbrushing on some cards, but in many cases, you could still see the team logo or team lettering that is league property. Although I don't collect the brand, I was hoping that MLB Properties would re-license Donruss in time for the 2010 season. I think this lawsuit ended any chances of this happening in the immediate future. The results from this lawsuit can affect other unlicensed products, specifically one Razor Collectibles who doesn't even have a license. I don't see Donruss winning this battle.

Then, in probably the biggest news in the Hobby since the MLBP overhauled their licenses, the NBA announces that Panini will be the sole manufacturer to produce basketball cards for the league. In layman's terms, this means that Upper Deck and Topps will not be able to produce licensed NBA cards for the next three years!!!

What does this all mean?

For those familiar with Panini, they are a company based in Italy who's been in the collectibles industry for a very long time. Growing up in the Philippines, and even my first few years in the US, Panini produced stickers and albums of various themes, whether it be sports (they did Baseball for a long time), dinosaurs, Barbie, Thundercats, you name it, kids ate them up. I personally loved the dinosaurs album they came up with in the early 80's. I must have bought tons and tons of packs, and carried that album everywhere. It was always a thrill to complete a page in the album, or better yet, complete one of those two-sticker, or four-sticker pictures, making sure that each one fit just right on the page (even if it meant that the stickers overlapped each other). I guess looking back, collecting Panini's stickers and using the album are the reasons why I have the mindset I do when it comes to baseball cards.

My favorite Panini product of all time...can these guys really make good NBA cards???
Back to the point. This has to be a huge blow to both Topps and UD. Reading further, the idea of one company making NBA cards has been a topic of discussion for quite some time. Supposedly, the NHL has had success having just Upper Deck as their league's exclusive card manufacturer (tell that to the collectors though...). And I guess talks between both companies and the NBA Properties were going to that direction. I don't think anybody saw Panini coming though.

Even before the NBA became this international global conglomerate we know of today, basketball was a very popular sport around the world. The 1992 Olympics and the Dream Team that crushed every team in it's path for the gold only helped bring the game's, and the league's popularity, to new heights. And today, many of the star's in the NBA are from other countries. It only makes sense for the NBA, if they want to continue having that world wide presence, work with a company whose name is known the world over. And lets face it, while the prices in the secondary market for current basketball cards can reach heights only the rarest baseball cards can every dream of reaching, the market for basketball cards seems to be pretty small compared to those who collect baseball, American football (not to be confused with football, aka soccer), and even hockey, in the United States/Canada.

How is this going to affect other sports??? The deal with the MLB Properties is going to expire soon...will they try this tactic? Has the NFL been considering the same thing? We know the NHL is already has their exclusive company, who's to say that the other sports aren't mulling over the same thing? And if so, who would win??? Would it be Topps, who has been around for 59 years in baseball, and 53 years in football? Would it be UD, whose innovations and use of technology has created the market we see today? Would Donruss, who in many football collector's opinions, step up and become the exclusive home for NFL football cards (pending lawsuit aside)? What does this all mean for the companies now?

With the economy tanking, and Topps and UD both cutting back products in all categories, Panini and the NBA have agreed to make at least 15-20 products for the basketball collecting market. I get the feeling that there will be some products exclusively marketed towards the US/North American market and others exclusively for Europe/Asia. Who's even to say that it's all going to be in cards? I'm sure there will be stickers...LOTS OF STICKERS.

While UD has been making NBA cards since 1991, Topps has had an on again-off again relationship with the league. Sure they've been celebrating 51 years making NBA cards, but there have been a number of years where there were no Topps basketball cards. Prior to this recent string of products (1992-2009), Topps was only around in 1957-58, took a ten year hiatus, came back for the 1968-69 season as a test product before creating products for the NBA between 1969-1982.

Now what does all of this have to do with baseball? Is any of this going to affect the Topps products we collect? In the short term, probably not. Unless the MLB Properties decides to say "it doesn't matter how long you've been around, Topps, you're gone," there will always be Topps baseball cards. But now that they don't have to deal with the NBA anymore, and it seems they won't be asking for an NHL license any time soon, maybe, just maybe, they can now focus their energies towards creating quality baseball, and yes football, cards that we will actually enjoy. And who knows, maybe Topps will bring back the baseball stickers and album. That would be fantastic.

I close tonight with the Topps press release, taken from Beckett, regarding their take on the NBA/Panini agreement:

“We’ve had a strong relationship with the NBA, but the deal they made with Panini does not make economic sense for Topps,” said Topps in a statement. “It may be great for the NBA, but the value wasn’t there for us and we’ve decided to invest elsewhere for the time being. We wish our colleagues at theNBA well and look forward to working with them in the future.”
I do want to congratulate Panini on this news, and wish them all the best. For those of you wishing that this didn't happen, it's only going to be three years. That may seem like a lifetime now, but it's going to go by pretty fast. Maybe after this three years, we'll see Topps and UD return to the game. Let's just wait and see what happens.

Sincerely,

JayBee Anama

Card That Make You Go...What??! of the Week: 2001 Topps Archives Ozzie Smith #81 of 450

This installment of the What??! of the Week features a Hall of Famer and one of the greatest (if not the greatest) defensive shortstops of all time, Ozzie Smith. I'm definitely nitpicking this one because the purpose of the set this card is in was to reprint a player's first and last card. Let me rephrase that, FIRST (99% of the time, a player's rookie) and LAST Topps card.

To celebrate Topps 50th anniversary in the baseball card market, Topps created a set that consisted of the reprinted first and final cards of 200 players called 2001 Topps Archives. Five decades worth of legendary players, MVP's, World Series Champions, fan favorites, and Hall of Famers (some HOF to be's) were included in this set. Every Topps design from the previous 50 years was represented (except for one, two if you want to nitpick, at that point). They even included four players who appeared in only one Topps card. Because of the enormity of the set, and the number of players and cards involved, the set was broken into two series. Ozzie Smith was included among the players chosen in series I.

As many of us know, the Wizard of Oz's first Topps card came out in 1979 Topps (see below). That's the set with had an even more blah design than the one from 1978. It was basically a large picture above a baseball with the old Topps logo, the player's name and position, and a banner with the team's name on it. There couldn't be a simpler (and to be honest, duller) design than this one that the Topps Company could have chosen to close out the 70's. Ozzie was a member of the San Diego Padres at the time, and his rookie card shows the wizard-in-training in a brown and yellow (think hamburger and mustard colored...did somebody say McDonald's???) uniform with sideburns that were oh-so-70's. He's not even staring at the camera, as his gaze is focused to his right, showing of those mutton chops for the world to see. Looking back, I'm sure if he had a chance to do the picture over...(then again, see his 2006 Topps Rookie of the Week card...)


Anyway, if his rookie card was from 1979, why was this card used as his "first" card for the 2001 Topps Archives set???:


This card looks like it's from the 1980 Topps set. Meaning this is Ozzie's second-year card. For accuracy's sake, this should be considered an uncorrected error card. And while, yes, this does look better than his rookie card, it still should not have been used.

Did Topps not have a copy of his 1979 card? Did the designers of this set think that the '79 card look so bad that this was the next best thing? Did they think that people wouldn't notice? Was Ozzie himself involved in the decision??? Topps, what were you thinking???

Sincerely,

JayBee Anama

P.S. This is what Ozzie Smith's 2001 Topps Archives card should have looked like if they could just have used the right card:


Not a bad MS Paint cut and paste job if I do say so myself...jba