Showing posts with label National Chicle. Show all posts
Showing posts with label National Chicle. Show all posts

Monday, September 20, 2010

Pack Break Week: 2010 Topps National Chicle


I went to Target last night, and bought a random pack of each of the following products:
  • 2010 Topps Series 1
  • 2010 Topps Series 2
  • 2010 Topps 206
  • 2010 Topps Allen & Ginter
  • 2010 Topps National Chicle
I never did get around to buying any Chicle cards, so this is my first pack ever. I think I'll buy a full master set on the Bay if and when prices crash. The same thing goes for Allen & Ginter (and yes, I have seen full master sets - the 350 cards plus 100 regular sized inserts - for under $60.00). The Topps 206 set is too brand new, and with all the Strasburg hype, prices are still high. I still don't have last year's set, so I probably will start there when the time is right.

Back to the point.

So this week (Monday through Friday), I will go ahead and open one of these packs and show them off to the world. All five are retail (from Target...duh), so I'm not expecting much in terms of the "big break." But I need something to do around here, and thought this would be a good start. And on Saturday, I will finally...finally...open the value box bought from WalMart a couple of weeks ago.

So let's get right to it. The first pack to open will be 2010 Topps National Chicle.


The cards that came out of the pack are (in the order of how they were packaged):


My thoughts...your average pack. Five pitchers, and one hitter. No inserts, no SP's. The art is very interesting indeed (you can click on the artist's name for a link to their website). If I ever acquire the complete set of National Chicle, one of the things I'd want to do is to sort the players by artist, and (if it's possible) run simulated games to see which artist had the best team (ie. in this case, team Kupka would have both Porcello and Rivera on its pitching staff while team Branch has youngsters Sanchez and Rodriguez available).

That's one pack down, four more to go. Tomorrow, I'll open the Series 1 pack. Here's hoping for a short print.

Sincerely,

JayBee Anama

Tuesday, January 12, 2010

Now That We've All Calmed Down About 2010 Topps National Chicle

It seems that there are very good explanations as to why there are cards of Babe Ruth in an Atlanta Braves outfit, Ichiro in a Seattle Pilots outfit, and what could possibly be some White Sox rookie (I'll let you know who this could be later on in the article...keep reading) doing his best Frank Thomas impression in the highly anticipated, yet so far critically panned 2010 Topps National Chicle set. And while there is some logic behind these cards, because there was not a whole lot of written explanation (or a sell sheet for that matter) at the time the images cameout, everybody, including myself, jumped the gun because of the information (or lack thereof) passed on by the number one source of the hobby.

Beckett's initial article about this new product included a 330 card checklist. What probably was overlooked was the fact that of the 330, there are 275 base cards. The 275 base cards are divided into two seperate categories: 205 active players (see the Pujols card below):


40 legendary players (HOF's, All-Time Fan Favorites, etc...see the Robinson card below):


and 25 Rookies (using that brand spanking new MLB Rookie Card logo).

The remaining 55 cards are split between three subsets: 25 "Retired Stars," 10 "Vintage Veterans," and 20 "Rookie Renditions." However, the number one source of the hobby initially forgot to give a description of what these three subsets are about, leaving us with only images of each of the three subsets (and hobby bloggers everywhere preparing the torches and pitchforks). But thanks to the gentleman over at Field Level View, (and because I didn't see this article from the boys and girls at Beckett), there is finally an explanation.

Okay...let's bring out the offending cards shall we???


The example above of Babe Ruth in an Atlanta Braves uniform is one of 25 cards within the subset called "Retired Stars Revisited." The concept utilizes 25 retired stars in the MODERN DAY JERSEYS of a team they played for. To wit, the Babe here ended his career with the Braves...the Boston Braves. So, we see him here, looking his "Chipper" best, in the Atlanta Braves outfit. In a subsequent article written by the boys and girls at Beckett (to calm the mass hysteria, I guess), it was explained that, yes, Topps did request these kinds of cards, and that other subjects in this set would include Walter Johnson of the Washington Senators wearing a modern day Washington Nationals uniform. Does this mean we could see Ernie Banks wearing the blue alternate Cubs jersey (the one that Carlos Zambrano INSISTS on wearing, whether away or AT HOME??!), or Ryno possibly wearing a 2009 Phillies outfit???


Ichiro here is one of ten players included in the Vintage Veterans subset. This puts ten modern day heroes in the jerseys of teams from a bygone era (is 1969 really bygone???) Example above of Ichiro wearing a Seattle Pilots jersey makes sense (although really Prince Fielder should be wearing this). Based on the checklist, we could see Pujols wearing a St. Louis Browns uniform, Chipper Jones wearing the Boston Braves outfit (trading off with the Babe again), Manny being Manny in a Brooklyn Dodgers uni, or even Ryan Zimmerman wearing the red, white, and blue...of the Montréal Expos!!!


Now comes the final subset. Twenty MLB Rookie Card Logo players (most who already are in the base set) will be featured in this subset called Rookie Renditions. The concept, take these twenty green athletes, and drop them into noteworthy cards in Topps' sixty year history. The above card is of the infamous 1990 Topps Frank Thomas No-Name-in-Front (NNOF), down to the missing black border at the bottom and that blue parallelogram without a name. But instead of it being the man who would be the "Big Hurt," it's White Sox catcher/infielder Tyler Flowers (most likely him, seeing that he's the only White Sox player on the rookie checklist).

Now that we've come to an understanding about these cards, I'm starting to warm up to them. I still think there will be collectors who just hate these concepts with a passion, but most of us have extinguished the torches and put away the pitchforks. I still will wait for a complete set to show up on eBay in April and buy it then.

But you have to admit, now that we know the rest of the story, don't you feel better about the product???

Sincerely,

JayBee Anama

Monday, January 11, 2010

Cards That Make You Go...What??! of the Week: 2010 Topps National Chicle Preview

In a variation of one of the popular segments of this humble, little blog, this is based off images that were released for a brand new product making it's debut in 2010. As much as I wanted to comment immediately about this on Friday, I decided to take a bit of time and read up a bit more before making a post about it. Regardless...



As soon as I heard that the first images of the new (and I didn't even know that this was happening) 2010 Topps National Chicle set came out, I thought, "Cool, another retro product."

Then I saw this:


WHAT??!

Okay, Ichiro in a Seattle Pilots uniform I can understand (even though I don't think the M's ever wore Pilots retro jerseys...EVER!!!). But it works...


But Babe Ruth in an Atlanta Braves jersey??? My first impression (and this was even BEFORE I READ STALE GUM'S POST) was that it looked more like a picture of Chipper Jones (and yes, it's been confirmed that the pose is actually of Ruth, not Chipper, but I'll be darned if they looked eerily similar from a distance).


Oh cool, they're also including artwork of some infamous Topps cards (based on what looks to be a 1990 Topps Frank Thomas No Name in Front error). Down to the airbrushed face of the unidentified runner. But last I checked, (and how do I put this in PC terms), the soon-to-be "Big Hurt" wasn't a white guy right??? I don't get it.

I know that these preview images are just that...previews. And that they may or may not necessarily make the cut. I also know that Topps commissioned a lot of good artists to make up this set. To be honest, I don't know if Topps "told the artist" to make an Atlanta Braves Babe card, or not, but it's not looking like this set looks any promising (actually, after looking here, it turns out that they DID!!!). And there's more!!! Other artists were asked to do the same thing with different players (imagine Manny being Manny in a Brooklyn Dodgers uni, or Walter Johnson wearing a uni from the current Washington Nationals).

You know, with initial reactions in the Hobby Blogging Community being mostly anywhere between negative and head-scratchily confused, I think prices for complete sets will be low, only because once people see what these cards look like all together, there can't possibly be that much demand. If they are that low, I might pick up a set, just for the fact that it honors the old Batter Up cards from the 1930's.


I just hope that they don't include the a couple of the fiascos (though I'm starting to doubt it), because other preview cards look really good.


But come on, Topps, really...

WHAT WERE YOU THINKING??!

Sincerely,

JayBee Anama